Return Last 50 posts First 100 posts

So Red Letter Media faded into obscurity....

1 Name: Anonymous : 2015-08-14 21:05
...but the SW prequels didn't.

There is a lesson to be learned from this. Don't try to destroy what you can't create.
2 Name: Anonymous : 2015-08-14 21:16
Of course the SW prequels aren't going to fade into obscurity.
3 Name: Anonymous : 2015-08-14 21:27
Red Letter Media faded into obscurity? Since when?
Also, the only reason the SW prequels didn't fade into obscurity is because people are still talking about how goddamn awful they were.
4 Name: Anonymous : 2015-08-14 21:35
Exactly, their ongoing review series has very high viewership and is awesome
5 Name: Anonymous : 2015-08-14 21:47
RLM is still going strong, the Star Wars prequels are still ridiculed to the point of exhaustion.
6 Name: Anonymous : 2015-08-14 21:58
Until a prequel fan writes a video review rebutting RLM's analysis and gets multiple million views and acclaim doing so, then no one can talk trash about Plinkett. The guy has talent, he's someone who's been dishonored and let down and had to set things right.

The prequels were an abomination. They needed to be systematically dismantled accordingly and shamed for all the internet to see. It's important that people are educated on how bad those films are, and RLM does a great job of doing so. Future generations of kids need to know the perils of the star wars prequels. It's dangerous to like bad movies like that and think they even belong in the same universe at the original (despecialized) trilogy.

Plinkett's reviews are a public service announcement on bad movies.
7 Name: Anonymous : 2015-08-14 22:08
One was always going to more well-known than the other because it was a trilogy that cost millions of dollars as has the Star Wars name, you know the one that might be the biggest film franchise ever. And RLM is still doing really well and their review is legendary in terms of online film criticism. As for the whole idea that critics shouldn't try to take down films when they don't make them, you should probably check out Roger Ebert's review for North, a review so notorious that it's probably more famous than the little-known film it's criticizing.
8 Name: Anonymous : 2015-08-14 22:18
I would not agree with that, multiple person encoutered them in the last 4 year's or so and are still talking about, referenced and so on.

Don't try to destroy what you can't create.

I'm really not sure with that logic, why would you destroy what you can create more than what you cannot create ?
9 Name: Anonymous : 2015-08-14 22:24
Your mom faded into obscurity.

Return Last 50 posts First 100 posts

Name: