Which one of these pathetic excuses for filmmakers is worse in your opinion? I know Uwe Boll has made some awful films such as BloodRayne: The Third Reich (2011), Auschwitz (2011), BloodRayne (2005), Alone in the Dark (2005), House of the Dead (2003), and In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale (2007), but has he made any films that are as worthless as The Dark Knight Rises (2012), Inception (2010), The Dark Knight (2008), and Interstellar (2014). Both lists of films are obviously terrible and anyone who disagrees should get a brain scan immediately, but which of these is worse? I honestly can't decide, but I would say Nolan is slightly worse as he is squandering larger budgets on his shit.

Boll is slightly more talented, and his films are far more entertaining...

Uwe Boll made Assault on Wall Street and the Rampage films (Not the third one though it seems, he he)

Where as Christopher Nolan made The Dark Knight Rises.

Nolan is clearly the worst.

Yes good observation. The Dark Knight Rises is just an insult to cinema.

Nolan is way worse. Boll is one of the best directors around

I think Boll is worse.

Anyone who says that Christopher Nolan is worse is just being dishonest and thus, his or her opinions mean nothing to me.

Retard. Clearly just another Nolan fanboy sheeple.

Nolan is the best of all time but Boll is also descent I enjoy his movies.