Return Last 50 posts First 100 posts

Liverpool value Sterling at £50 million

1 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 21:51
And they've rejected a £30 million bid from Man City for him, before you all criticize the valuation, he's English so of course he warrants a big price tag....

What's up white people.
2 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 21:55
Absolutely ridiculous valuation. I'd like to think no one would be stupid enough to spend £50m on him, but there are a lot of stupid people involved in football...
3 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 22:02
Can't really blame Liverpool for asking for it. The FA's racist rules - rules they want to make even more discriminatory - inflate the values of English players even more than they already are and City are struggling to meet them. I'm hopeful they get challenged in court, they're blatantly illegal.
4 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 22:10
Agreed about it being on dodgy grounds legally. It's certainly not the only rule that is questionable legally though. I'm surprised clubs like PSG & Man City who have backers with bottomless pits of money haven't challenged the FFP rules. Limiting sponsorship has a direct influence on how much a player can be paid so is clearly a restraint of trade.
5 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 22:14
City and particularly have threatened it, that's why UEFA have loosened the regulations. I don't think either side is willing to risk going to court over it.
6 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 22:19
huh!

fa's rules- no its UEFA's rules- they say you can only have a 17 man squad in CL football and a max of 25(so 8 home grown and home grown doesnt even mean english)

The FA's rules are about adding domestic players with zero limit on squad sizes so you could still potentially get foreign players and field a totally foreign team.

its different when you are restricted to a 25 man squad with a minimum of 8 home grown- Its UEFA that is hitting city not the FA. within the FA's rules all they have to do is promote there youth team to there PL squad- they dont even need to play them, but they can still buy as many foreign players as they want as long as they have the correct amount of domestic
7 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 22:23
Whoevers rules they are, they're illegal.
8 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 22:30
when its Europe wide and its an EU law- no one gives a shit. The EU doesn't care about the lively hood of the super rich footballers- I have no moral issues with them forgetting about that extremely rare career but enforcing it in normal society.
9 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 22:32
Ridiculous. Footballers constantly being stigmatised as overpaid, pampered and thick is one thing, saying they don't deserve the protection of the law is bloody outrageous.
10 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 22:36
The EU doesnt care about the lively hood of the super rich footballers- I have no moral issues with them forgetting about that extremely rare career but enforcing it in normal society

You can't pick and choose when to apply a law. The law applies to everyone regardless of whether you're earning millions or on minimum wage. That's the very foundation of having fair laws.
11 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 22:51
It's both, and while technically it's not about nationality we all know it is designed to try and improve the national team by favouring English players. Premier League sides are limited to 25 men + U21s and a certain number of them must be trained in England or Wales for three years before the age of 21. That blatantly discriminates against foreigners.
12 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 23:01
but you can add under 21's to the 25 man squad(you dont have to leave them out and still use them)- you can bend the rules, by then buying forign under 21's- the issues city are having is purely due to the CL and UEFA not the FA.
13 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 23:03
You have to buy them when they're under 18 (or on their eighteenth birthday) for them to qualify going forward. That's far too early to tell if players will make it or not, it's morally questionable and it's illegal in a lot of cases. Greg Dyke wants to reduce the age to 15 and insist on 12 homegrown per squad.
14 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 23:07
Having poached him from QPR they have to give a large percentage of his transfer fee to them, so possibly another reason why they're holding out for a larger wad.
15 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 23:20
The Telegraph reported it at 20% to an English club, 25% if he moves abroad
16 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 23:24
I wouldn't rate him much higher than Berahino
17 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 23:40
A half-decent English player with a couple of years left on his contract, sounds about right.
18 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-12 23:52
This is why you buy abroad. You can have two Depays for the price of one Sterling.

I also don't think you can trust a player who runs like he's mincing.
19 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-13 00:03
you allways reject the first offer- its standard business

they also know man city want him bad as they need to fill the English qouta.

its just business ,

i mean pardew says dont touch bolaise unless you wanna dish out 40m.(bolaise is however dual nationality english so would be a home grown player - although many report that he isnt- but its false)

they dont really mean thats there value!!
20 Name: Anonymous : 2015-06-13 00:08
...Tesco Clubcard points!

Return Last 50 posts First 100 posts

Name: