Is it true that modern engineers can't even figure it out?

They were built from the top down. Don't listen to the engineers.

Did you hold up the first block so that the keystone could be laid?

That is not true at all. They were fairly easy to build using a number of methods.

They knew about anti-gravity and how to use it.

Watch Ancient Aliens.

>>6
^^Bellend^^

The Aliens, of course.

many, many slaves and many, many years...

The same way stonehenge was built. Advanced alien technology. You don't think they could shape and move those huge rocks around with what they had at the time, do you?

Well yes it was advanced technology (in a far more prosperous time and not the only time it has happened) but they had the technology here. On earth. They didn't need to call on help from a long distance away. They were living here among us. Were - being the operative word. And anti-gravity devices were mainly used for the purpose of building. In a way, thank goodness it's not here now. Think what Soros and his filth would do with it.

Aliens did it.

They utilised knowledge of basic construction and thousands of slaves over decades to pull it off.

socialism, state workers, state plan, state administration & state funding.

Possible. Great things can be accomplished in a socialist system when it's run properly.

The pyramids were most likely built using Sound Frequency Vibration Levitation technology.

Technology that at least only publicly we have only been able to replicate on small scale.

Things like great deperessions?

Ben Carson said they were used to store grain.

Pure brute muscle, nothing more.

Aliens, anti-gravitation devices



People will buy anything.

Actually the devices weren't for sale. So do your hyper clown dance and bench press your little 40lb weights. I'm sure you feel quite amused with yourself.

>>21

Actually the devices weren't for sale.

Gee, I thought the ancient Egyptian Amazon had them for 49.95

LOL, no. They were easy to construct too. Magnetic power was harvested in very meaningful ways back then. However I am glad Amazon, the company today as it is, doesn't have that kind of item in stock. Humans have really devolved over time.

I figured it out long ago.

They simply poured rocks and sand on one side of the pyramid to make a ramp. As the pyramid got taller, the ramp got taller.

They could have hardened the ramp by embedding large stones in the ramp.

Then, you can roll logs or round stones under a "cart" which holds the stone. The cart is moved using ropes pulled by a hundred workers.

The rope is lubricated using animal fat where necessary.

Getting the stone into the cart requires a smaller ramp. The stone is pulled up the small ramp with the cart alongside the small ramp. The stone drops into the cart at the end of the ramp.

A mixture of sand and animal fat can lubricate the ball bearing stones. Or, they could have used bronze bearings.

The sand ramp is then dug away.

Viola! You have a pyramid.

You heard it here first.

Um. No. Egypt wasn't a desert at that time. There wasn't that much sand.

The sand was always there.

No it wasn't. That part of the world wasn't the huge desert that it is now. I guess you didn't get the memo or studied any form of geological timelines.

There was one guy, can't remember his name, but he speculates the Sphinx is alot older than mainstream historians believe because there is evidence of rain erosion indicating it was built during a more tropical period in Egyptian history.

BINGO! Yes, that is correct. That structure is older than most other structures in that area but even during the building of the pyramids, the land was very fertile and green.

Thank you. I'm glad some people know this. There were plenty of advanced civilizations throughout earth's history. But sadly the oldest texts in existence is mainly biblical. There are ancient texts preserved in old Druid sites and troves but they're not on any bookstore shelves for the consumers. So much I wish I could say. But that is not for me to say now.

Well you're not alone. But a lot of unexplained things would be made clear without the brainwashing of the educational system. And that includes, unfortunately, the religious element too.

This website tries to offer a different perspective on life than the mainstream media. I think it does a good job for the most part, but it seems to collect all sorts of alternative information and presents them as fact without checking the credibility of the source:

http://thegreaterpicture.com/

I would like to hear your thoughts, as you seem to be open-minded about this subject.

>>32
I was reading through that site just now. It looks good. It does have a good grip on some things. Other points are a bit shaky though. For instance, the art of these structures were more common than even they state given that they tell of worldwide pyramid sites. And not all of them functioned in the same way. The Pyramids at Giza were at the ultimate peak of communication with others. Throughout the world and yes, elsewhere. The other lesser pyramids don't have the same characteristics and served for other purposes. Devolving into human sacrifice which is a strong indicator of how lowly humankind descended.

They don't really seem to touch on that too much. Another thing they speculate on is the use of star charts aligned with pyramids for the use of measuring time. Such as a calendar of sorts. And no, that's not what they were aligned with the stars in the belt of Orion for.