Return Last 50 posts First 100 posts

Are liberals forgetting Wikileaks emails barely got coverage

1 Name: Anonymous : 2016-12-16 19:22
The Wikileaks emails that were supposedly hacked by the Russians didn't get much coverage. Trump's scandals like the Access Hollywood tape and Tax returns got way more attention
2 Name: Anonymous : 2016-12-16 19:33
Yes, exactly! This is the first time they've collectively acknowledged them as serious or damaging. Over and over again I heard "nothing incriminating" and "not a big deal". Some outlets refused to even talk about them. And as such, many average Americans had no idea what they even entailed nor did they care. "Grab them by the pussy" was more catchy.
3 Name: Anonymous : 2016-12-16 19:45
yep. Libs kept going on about how the Wikileaks emails were no big deal and it just shows that Hillary is a "normal person"
4 Name: Anonymous : 2016-12-16 20:12
You're conflating the DNC email hack (damaging, re Bernie) with Hillary's FBI investigation (nothing incriminating and not a big deal).
5 Name: Anonymous : 2016-12-16 20:22
Great point, most of the mouth breathers at my workplace barely knew anything about them but knew plenty about Trump's "antics".
6 Name: Anonymous : 2016-12-16 20:39
Somewhere around a 10-1 ratio. Except one night of the media outlets sampled, while most averaged 7 minutes of TMZ to 40 seconds of wiki leaks, NBC chose to do 8 1/2 minutes of Trump trashing and zero yes 0 time on wiki leaks. Thanks MSM, Americans were watching and were silently disgusted by your biased reporting. But they were not silent when it was time to vote.
7 Name: Anonymous : 2016-12-16 20:49
Yeeeup, even if Putin himself phished Podesta's password and sent the emails via floppy disks to Assange there's no way that had any discernible effect on the outcome.
8 Name: Anonymous : 2016-12-16 21:03
Don't be a Trump Revisionist and Russian Apologist. "Oh, they didn't get covered, and it didn't matter!" The amount of coverage doesn't matter, the content and reach does. It eroded trust in the DNC and Clinton campaign, perhaps rightfully so as you will next mention - damning things concerning Bernie's ouster, but not so much, if any on Hillary. But it doesn't change that Russia did it, Trump denied it. Trump will not accept security briefings, and will not accept intelligence agencies reports, and even fully admits "lock her up" was a phony election line that "played well." He is unfit to serve, and we need more information to disprove that he colluded with the Russians, seeing as he's also on record as asking Russia to hack Hillary. Doesn't matter whether it "got coverage" or not - and it did by the way.
9 Name: Anonymous : 2016-12-16 21:21
That's what I've been saying. If Trump was in cahoots with Russia, you would think that would be the No. 1 thing the Democrats would have focused on because, I mean come on, Russia interfering in the election sounds just teeny bit more important than Trump making comments that hurt women's feelings, wouldn't you say? Plus they only thrust this back into the spotlight after their recount backfired.

The Democrats are just trying to save face. The problem is even if their accusations are true, nobody is going to believe them because they, along with the media, have already told so many lies about Trump over the last 18 months.
10 Name: Anonymous : 2016-12-17 20:07
Yes, I notice you do that a lot when you want to disagree, but you can't find anything you can sensibly disagree with.
11 Name: Anonymous : 2016-12-20 01:04
LOL @ the deluded retards who think Trump will become president. Regardless of what the electoral college did, Obama still has to transition power to Trump, and since it has been revealed that Trump's election was a Russian forgery, Obama has every legal right to stop that transition and is expected to announce his plans in early January.

Return Last 50 posts First 100 posts

Name: