Return Last 50 posts First 100 posts
Where does JJ Abrams go from here?
1 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 14:35
He made a film that earned a billion in ten days.
And in terms of moving up after success, no franchise is bigger than Star Wars.
What does he do now?
2 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 17:10
Batman v iPhone 7sU Superman: Twilight Justice of Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 9
3 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 18:23
Access to the Disney corporate washroom. Nothing but brandy and blowjobs.
4 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 18:39
A Stargate movie. A Starship Troopers movie.
5 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 18:50
Simon Cowell will hire him for an X Factor reboot.
6 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 19:15
Indian Jones 5?
Mission Impossible 7?
A Lost movie?
7 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 19:23
A proper version of Expendables 3.
8 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 19:27
Considering how well the real Expendables 3 did, I'm pretty sure, that's a big no-no for J.J.
9 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 19:33
Retirement, if we're lucky.
10 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 20:35
To his grandmother's house. You know, over the river and through the woods.
11 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 20:52
Well he's producing Star Wars Episode 8 and 9, and a 6th Mission: Impossible.
12 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 21:31
hopefully he'll finally make something original for his next project. all he does is piggy back off of other people's franchises (Mission Impossible, Star Trek and Star Wars). good lord, come up with something original.
13 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 21:42
Super 8 is pretty good, but even that is a clear attempt to emulate Spielberg.
14 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 21:57
"But"?
15 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 22:06
Did I stutter?
16 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 22:30
The word is incongruous in context. It's like saying "It's a good film, but the score sounds like Prokofiev." The reader could be forgiven for thinking, "What the hell does he mean by 'but'?"
17 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 22:40
It makes perfect sense if you follow the thread.
18 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-30 23:26
On re-reading it's easy to tell what you were probably intending to say, but it's not what you said. You didn't say 8mm was original but emulating Spielberg. You said it was good but emulating Spielberg. If you meant to say the former, then yes, your comment makes sense.
19 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-31 00:01
The "but" means he considers this a bad element of a movie that is still good overall. Not sure what is hard to get...
20 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-31 01:22
I usually like your posts, but really man.
Every film ever made is someone' attempt to emulate someone or something else. Even the first film tried to emulate a photograph they saw before. Originality is something that only exists in concept, in reality it's figment of someone's imagination.
21 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-31 01:29
It's all downhill from now. It's not like people see him in the same vein as James Cameron or Christopher Nolan as this ambitious blockbuster film-maker who puts his heart and soul into his films. Whilst he did a solid job in directing Star Wars, he was more or less just a hired gun. He had more creative leeway with Star Trek than Star Wars and even then he had to follow the studio line.
22 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-31 02:27
Back the Future 4?
Indiana Jones 6?
Godfather Part 4?
The Room 2
Plan nine from outer space 2
Troll 4
I mean the guy is so versatile and talented that he can do it all.
23 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-31 03:00
Teenage Schindler's List reboot.
24 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-31 03:05
Schindler's Tumbler Blog?
25 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-31 05:40
To the bank.
26 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-31 07:21
The Muppets take Oz.
27 Name: Anonymous : 2015-12-31 09:43
The Muppets Go To Oz - An Ozzy Osbourne Concert?
Return Last 50 posts First 100 posts