old fashioned ways of meeting girls

1 Name: Anonymous : 2014-11-11 02:39

Dating Sites /lounge/, lay it on me.

I'm considering checking out RVSP/Match/Whatever in addition to the old fashioned ways of meeting girls. I've read some reviews and they're all over the place, but /lounge/ tends to be pretty straight (if vitriolic) about these kinds of things.

Good/bad? Worth time and money or a waste?

2 Name: Anonymous : 2014-11-11 04:46

Never tried a paid for site, bt the free ones seem to be full of chavs/fatties/bunny boilers/sluts with 5 kids.

fuck that

3 Name: Anonymous : 2014-11-11 06:22

>>2
Thats my concern. I'm okay with paying for a site if its got a reasonable proportion of alright girls, but the free ones look terrible. And I'd rather not pay unless I know its not a sinkhole.

4 Name: Anonymous : 2014-11-11 07:10

>>3
Yeah, my problem is that I'm not looking for a long term relationship, I just wanna casual fuck. So I don't give a shit about all the compatability crap on match etc. As long as a girl is intelligent enough to hold a decent convo and we can have a laugh for a night then that'll do. Unfortunately any of the girls like that on free sites are like totally christian and want long term and look like the kind of girls who have never tried anal and don't like giving blowjobs etc.

Sorry I can't offer any more insight, hopefully someone with some experience will be along soon. Good luck in your endeavours anyway anon

5 Name: Anonymous : 2014-11-11 08:01

Worth time and money or a waste?

waste

6 Name: Anonymous : 2014-11-11 09:21

>>3
the paid sites pad their databases with shitloads of fake profiles and fake activity and once you pay the fake activity stops.

Never tried a paid for site, bt the free ones seem to be full of chavs/fatties/bunny boilers/sluts with 5 kids.

the paid ones are the same but with less men if you can find a site that isnt scammy

I don't give a shit about all the compatability crap on match

match is for people in their 30s who want to find marriage potential

7 Name: Anonymous : 2014-11-11 09:42

>>5
>>6
Not OP here, but cheers for the insights /lounge/rs. Just as I thought really. Such is life.

8 Name: Anonymous : 2014-11-11 10:04

I read that in his voice.

9 Name: Anonymous : 2014-11-11 10:49

>>8
same

10 Name: Anonymous : 2014-11-11 11:44

>>4
>>6
Cheers guys; that's pretty much what I expected.
>>8
>>9
I almost made it once with a girl, seemed less fitting for the topic.

11 Name: Anonymous : 2014-11-11 18:41

i don't understand pansexual, one of my close friends identifies as it, and i just think she's bisexual, but just prefers the attention she gets by saying shes pan sexual.