Why no successful manned mission to Mars.

1 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 01:21

Why hasn't there been a successful manned mission to Mars by now

2 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 01:24

we haven't got the technology

3 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 01:26

>>2
prove it

4 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 01:32

>>1
i've been trying to get there for years man, the fucking miata just won't make it.

5 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 01:34

Because Niggers and Jews.. That's the only Logical, Ethical, Rational, and Scientific Explanation my dear sir.

6 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 01:37

Because non-white people and feminists.

7 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 01:40

>>2
*money

8 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 01:43

>>1
>>2
All we need for a maned mission to Mars is a way to make money off of it

9 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 01:45

>>2
Yea we do.

10 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 01:47

find oil on Mars and you know we'll be there in 10 years.

11 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 01:50

>>8
Mars is worth a lot of money

12 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 01:55

>>1
there hasn't been an unsuccessful one either

13 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 02:02

No reason to go. No payoff

14 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 02:06

>>1
If the countries of the world had spent as much on space travel and research as on warfare, Mars would be old news by now with a full on colony. They would be planning a journey to Alpha Centauri by now.

15 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 02:10

>>1
Its too far away...

16 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 02:14

There is no need to go to mars. The moon was a race, if there is no competitors why even race?

17 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 02:23

Nobody wants to cough up the money, simple as that. it'll cost billions.

18 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 02:25

>>14
if the US alone diverted its military budget to Mars we'd have a whole new fucking world to live on

19 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 02:27

>>16
To inspire the passions of mankind?

20 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 02:32

Because going to Mars buys fewer votes than cutting social spending 1% costs.

21 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 02:35

>>17

it'll cost billions.

try trillions to be properly done, moreover most of the technology neccessary doesn't even exist

22 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 02:37

Because the U.S. decided they won the Space Race in 1969, so they let the Apollo program die as the 70s progressed, replaced it with a space taxi, and then gave that up to become hitchhikers.

23 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 02:39

>>1
Many talented engineers are wroking on iphone7, iphone7+, iphone7++ Director's cut champion edition.

Regurgitating and re-consuming the same old achievements is more profitable, and so pays more to the engineering talent. Bigger house, prettier wife, nicer cars, more kids, etc.

Look at the AMD fallout. They're blowing up over AMD's Ryzen processor. That's what our talent has been doing.

24 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 02:41

Moon Landing was fake so why would humans going to Mars be real?

25 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 02:43

>>13
So going to Mars and after that going to asteroids to mine them isn't worth it?

Nigger asteroids are worth trillions

26 Name: Anonymous : 2017-02-23 03:10

This_is_bait.png

27 Name: Anonymous : 2017-05-08 23:50

Cost to much, better to bomb the middle east instead, libthinking.