Is that really a wise move for the president-elect?

Not sure

Is it really wise to claim that Russia (a country we are already on thin ice with) is responsible for a hack that may or may not have even happened, and may or may not have even accomplished anything at all?

Seems like the timing is convenient, and the media just wants something to make people outraged by.

The intelligence community claims it might have happened. But they also won't release the evidence that it might have happened, because releasing that evidence would mean the country sees how the intelligence community acquires information, which is secret.

In other words: The nation is backed into a corner and just has to believe whatever the hell they tell us.

Which, in my book, immediately makes it suspect.

They could accomplish whatever political agenda they wanted by saying bullshit stuff like that about ANY country.

Stop being such sheeple and demand facts before plastering headlines everywhere.

Sarah Palin called him an Anti-American and for WikiLeaks to be shut down, but now all of a sudden praises him because he exposed a bunch of bullsh!t by the Democrat party. They don't care if its true or not, as long as its incriminating democrats in some way, it must be true.

Fact.

They're corrupt. They need to be belittled.

Was is better that so many people were belittling them because they choose to investigate Hillary...

He knows more than the intelligence community generals.