Fewer than half the capital's population are white British, gangsters from Somalia terrorise the suburbs and even the tramps are immigrants, reveals astonishing new book

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/columnists/article-3412616/How-Labour-turned-London-foreign-city.html

Only in the shit parts.

>>2
That's still 90% of London.

You ever walked around Knightsbridge? It's liked being in Dubai or some rich Arab state.

Are you suggesting we should close the London property market to smelly foreigners?

They don't live there though. Most are just there to shop. Lets face it, shops in London are grateful to foreign shoppers. No one spends the way arabs and chinese spend.

You're joking, right? Most of Knightsbridge and Mayfair property are foreign owned.

Of course foreign owned, do you know how fucking expensive those areas are. Which Londoner is going to be able to afford million-pound properties?

Yeah because all Londoners are poor. There are no rich Londoners.

So you are angry about rich foreigners being in your country spending money and helping your economy?

The UK has been governed by the Conservative party for the last 6 years:

https://archive.today/9KdJN/664d6c07c8be5040562f368490af9d3ab8d71ab7.png

But it began with Labour.

Since 2000, migration to almost every country has doubled. The UK is the norm, rather than the exception:

https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MIG

That's just a consensus and bandwagaon fallacy. Just because other countries have doubled their migration doesn't mean it's right and that the UK should have.

>>14
You mean 'just because almost every other country has ...'

You're identifying immigration as a specifically English or London phenomenon, when the same thing has happened in every other OECD nation.

It's just a fact of life that nobody living in a shitty country with no money is going to look at news and entertainment media from prosperous, democratic nations, shrug their shoulders and curse their bad luck for being born in a country where corruption and incompetence mean they have no prospect of improving their lot.

Cheap internet and cheap air travel are the game changing factors you're looking for, not a conspiracy (by parties of both right and left) to eliminate the white race in every country on Earth (even countries where there are no white people):

https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MIG

All that said, we probably agree that the UK authorities have been particularly poor in responding to this new global reality. Recent efforts to increase the UK's manufacturing exports have singularly failed, but - done right - that would be exactly the way to take advantage of the newly increased labour pool.

Since 2000, migration to almost every country has doubled. The UK is the norm, rather than the exception:

Every WHITE country - fixed. Because who the hell want to emigrate to some shithole full of superstitious darkies?

Ah, the little factoid the "multicultural" crowd will never note.

Every WHITE country

Your quote omitted the link I gave to migration statistics for OECD nations. Since when have Mexicans, Koreans, and Chileans been Caucasians?

https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MIG

who the hell want (sic) to emigrate to some shithole

Or live in one. Most people here have left the rural backwater that spawned them for somewhere with greater economic prospects. If you have the misfortune to be born in Somalia, that means moving somewhere other than Somalia.

Here's the Progressives' M.O. with regard to immigration policy in western countries:

In whatever locality possible, "foreignize" the native population, in situ, by engineering a non-native majority in order to: a) subsume the existing culture and b) effectively disenfranchise the native populace.

Labour had a c), engineer votes.

Did you really think you could rule an empire so large that the sun was always shining somewhere, refer to them as younger brothers and sisters under Victoria's beneficient sway, and not have them and their ancestors coming there?

You live in a nation that is still quite wealthy, because you spent centuries bullying and stealing from people in Africa, Asia, and elsewhere.

Live with the consequences.

(Also the much better food).

Did you really think you could rule an empire so large that the sun was always shining somewhere, refer to them as younger brothers and sisters under Victoria's beneficient sway, and not have them and their ancestors coming there?

When was Romania part of the British Empire?

>>23
Or the rest of Europe for that matter. >>22 is a fool.

Britain has rather benefited from the European Union as well, wouldn't you say?

Or are you precisely what you accuse me of being?

Can't have the benefits of free trade while hiding behind a closed border.

You liked it as long as it made you rich.

Well, as long as it made some of you rich. And no, Labor doesn't get the blame for any of this.

Ask Bram Stoker.

I can imagine if you are confronted with somewhere like Forest Gate in London which has a high Muslim population, or Golders Green which has a high Jewish population, or Brixton which has a high black population, it might seem strange or even scary the first time you visit if you grew up in an all white neighbourhood where there was maybe two or three black people in your entire school.

But, does it really matter? All the white Londoners I know and grew up with and all those who have moved into London for work haven't got an issue about London's multiculturalism, they just accept it like they accept the sky is blue. You can rally against it, but you know, I don't know what good it is going to do either you or anyone else.

That's terrible.