what do u no that the architects and engineers for 9/11 truth d/n know

i don't pretend to know what happen but there are somethings that you can't ignore and thats the collapse of wtc 7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mamvq7LWqRU

architects and engineers some 1200 or so have gathered to question the official story that a fire caused that building to collapse , i don't have the training that they do , but my eyes tell me that the building was imploded and these guys and women agree

http://www.ae911truth.org

why are you so sure that they are wrong ? our gov't told us there were WMDs in iraq , we murdered a country based on false info , your country has and will lie to you ,

I know that the WTC was not a controlled demolition. So that's one thing I know and they don't.

what training do you have to say that it was not? did you see wtc 7 video ?

>>3
what training do you have to say that it was?

I've seen metalurgy PHD's (and a blacksmith with a hammer) talk about steel weakening (loosing 50% of its strength) at much less then temp of burning jet fuel.

It's not much put still starts to unravel the story.

there was no burning jet fuel on building 7 , so how did that collapse in the same manner as building 1 and 2 , see the video judge for yourself then how do you explain the architects and engineers who are trained , what is your training to disagree

So there are 1,200 architects and engineers who are credulous fools. So what? Ben Carson has proved you can have impressive academic qualifications and still be an idiot on certain matters concerning science.

What about the number far exceeding 1,200 of architects, engineers, demolitions experts, defence experts, and other experts in related fields, who reject the truther nonsense? What do you know that they don't?

why are you so sure that they are wrong

Because I'm not a complete idiot.

our gov't told us there were WMDs in iraq

Yep, and that was pretty quickly exposed as a fabrication. You honestly think the government is competent enough to keep a conspiracy like their own involvement in 9/11 a secret when they couldn't manage a relative trifle in the form of WMDs in Iraq?

"So what? Ben Carson has proved you can have impressive academic qualifications and still be an idiot on certain matters concerning science. "

i agree but ben carson was one man this is 1200 architects and engineers who disagree

"What about the number far exceeding 1,200 of architects, engineers, demolitions experts, defence experts, and other experts in related fields, who reject the truther nonsense? What do you know that they don't?"

you say there is more that disagree but offer no proof , please give a link that supports your position

i agree but ben carson was one man this is 1200 architects and engineers who disagree

Appeal to Majority fallacy, my dear tango.

well yes except for the fact that he offers that ben carson is wrong a science issue so thered=fore you can't trust a scientist , yet when over 1200 agree that the official story is inconsistent w/ their training then 1 person view vs 1200 people's view does matter , I'm not scientist or an architect so my opionion is not that credible even though when you view the collapse of building 7 it defies logic and common sense , it was never hit by a plane and a fire supposedly made it collapse , the engineers disagree

well yes except for the fact that he offers that ben carson is wrong a science issue so thered=fore you can't trust a scientist ,

He was simply explaining to you in simple terms the appeal to Authority fallacy.

I'm not saying a 9/11 conspiracy isn't real but why would the conspirators plant detonation bombs to bring down the building? Wasn't it enough to fly a jet into it?

Rather than obsess about details that don't really matter how about someone finding out if the US Government was directly involved or had prior knowledge and did nothing to stop it? But of course that will never happen and the whole thing will just get bumped off into nutty conspiracy theory land where nothing ever gets resolved.

he's talking about 7 but I agree that trying to debate with people who have no interest in talking about it is a worthless endeavor