It's wealthier than the US, there are plenty of Mosques, they have plenty of land, and to be honest, it'd just be a better fit for them.

It isn't wealthier than the US and they've said they're not taking any Syrian refugees.

My bad, according to the World Bank the US and Saudi Arabia are effectively tied, but I bet they have lower taxes and more government paid benefits... The Syrians (as well as the worldwide Muslim community) should be asking the Saudi why they won't take any refugees???

>>2
Then why should we in the west? And don't give me this garbage that's it's the humane thing to do. If it's the humane thing to do then Saudi Arabia should step up and help fellow Muslims.

US/Europe should round them all up, put them on those massive barge cargo ships, take them to the shore of UAE and Saudi Arabia...

And just dump them off on shore of Dubai or whatever.

"Here ya go. Merry Christmas!"

I don't support "rounding up" anyone who's already settled, but Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, need to take in 500,000 or so before Europe or North America start taking any more.

Cause those countries are fascist crapholes. Luckily the US isn't, right?

Says a lot when not even the Muslims want more Muslims in their countries.

Why would anyone want to go to Saudi Arabia?

If this was a serious question, I seriously question your intellectual capability.

Going by that logic we should take in all Saudi Arabians as refugees too.

Well if I was a Muslim from a poor country I'd certainly want to go to Saudi Arabia... The average income is similar to the US, but the entire country is geared towards Islam...

Because they all hate Wahhabist's and the Wahhabist's hate all the other sects.

Simply because SA has refused to accept any of them.

SA has offered to pay for 200 Mosques in Germany to support the refuges there.

SA wants to spread Islam round the world. it sees the movement of Syrian Muslims to Europe as good for its cause.

They wont take any themselves as they are not a moral and humane society.