Return Last 50 posts First 100 posts
White Countries have forced world to show they are weak
1 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 10:01
The United States, Europe..yes even exCommunist anti-west Russia...I would even put powerless Australia into this... The United States overplayed its cards and couldn't even control small powerless countries like Iraq or Afghanistan....so basically the world is calling their bluff.
Winner: China
2 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 10:29
Leftist have made us weak.
3 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 10:44
No actually by 2007 it was clear.....Republicans actually created the mess and then once you call a superpower's bluff its over
Turkey[pro US country] just bitch slapped Russia[anti-US] country.
4 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 11:05
Obama has destablized Iraq even futher by pulling everyone out as well as assisting with Arab Spring that toppled the rest of the dictators, and still wants Assad. That is on them.
5 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 11:26
>>4i agree with the second point,but, can you imagine the liberals playing monday morning quarterback if he had NOT supported the so-called Arab Spring, and it failed?
THEN, if it failed in terms of not even accomplshing any regime change, , THAT would have been blamed on the West as well..
as to your first point, the pullout...Iraq, Afghanistan, how long ARE you going to have to be prepared to stay there?
Let's face it, you would have to stay there forever...who wants to?
Enough was enough...time to cut our losses..
6 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 11:52
We are still in South Korea, Japan, Germany, Italy since the war, we can and should have stayed or allies with at least a residual force. Only time can stabilize the country. It is not something that will have happened in couple of years. It was just dumb to just leave, when you could see the problem a mile away, even without the vast intelligence resources the president has.
7 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 12:11
We are still in South Korea, Japan, Germany, Italy since the war, we can and should have stayed or allies with at least a residual force.
that's right...but what is your role in ANY of those countries??
it is not to provide internal security and order, is it?
You are not called upon to do any fighting on a regular basis...in fact, you never do...you do not have to fight the local populace ongoing..
the only reason you are there, is part of an alliance deterrent to external aggression..
There is no similarity.
You are not there to fix them..if there ever was a mission for that, such as Germany/Japan, it ended almost 3 generations ago.
There were not hopeless.
None of them, are the middle-east.
The only thing this is anything like, IS Vietnam.
And you abandoned that in failure as well..
And I don't actually think that was as fkd up as this is.
8 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 12:27
We are still in South Korea, Japan, Germany, Italy since the war
Do you actually believe that's even remotely comparable? If so, elaborate on that. Tell us what they have in common with, for instance, Iraq.
we can and should have stayed or allies with at least a residual force.
Well, if you'd be OK with US troops not having immunity from prosecution, there would still be US troops. That was the sticking point in the negotiations. Iraq is its own country. They wanted US troops out. Unless, of course, they would be willing to take responsibility for their own actions. Something which they, apparently, were not.
Hence, when you say "we can and should", do you have any idea what you're talking about? Are you saying US troops should've stayed against the will of the Iraqi government? In other words, the US should occupy foreign soil by force? Does that sound like it would work out well?
Only time can stabilize the country.
Time doesn't stabilize? It's what you do with the time that counts. If anything, the region has proven time doesn't do anything at all when it comes to old conflicts. The conflict between Shi'ites and Sunnis has been going on for more than 1,000 years. Time hasn't stabilized that. What unique perspective do you think US troops would've added to the mix?
It is not something that will have happened in couple of years. It was just dumb to just leave, when you could see the problem a mile away, even without the vast intelligence resources the president has.
The Iraqi government did not want US troops there anymore. It's their country. What do you suggest? Should the west have re-occupied the place by force? Is that your "solution"? For how long? At what price? What difference would it make in the long run? Do you think the sectarian factions would suddenly drop their arms, kiss and make up?
9 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 12:44
Please, we 'Europeans' have invented everything in the world worth having - from Marxism to democracy to the computer you're typing on.
And America is the world's only real superpower now that the Soviet Union is impotent.
And China needs the West's wealthy consumer market more than we need their cheap shoddy manufactured goods.
10 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 13:08
Europe is a piece of Shit. Old gross congested. No wonder the trash of the world wants to go there.
United States just California coastal cities are a reason for its amazingness to be honest...
11 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 13:22
United States just California coastal cities are a reason for its amazingness to be honest...
Is that the same shitty coast line thats falling into the sea?
12 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 13:32
The fact that Middle Easterners are clamoring to move to Europe shows you're wrong.
Yeah, I'm Californian, it's amazing here. But New London is still the hub of the earth.
13 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 13:54
You mean the poor refugees who don't even clothes on their back. Yes next to hell its nice....
Notice how all the rich ones move to California. Beverley Hills/Bel-Air/Orange County and San Diego County not to mention NorCal wit the tech boom.
14 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 14:10
NorCal
Cheerist, can you try any harder to sound a FOB? Do you say "Cali" as well? It's Northern California. We don't shorten it.
15 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 14:19
I have not been there and unlikely will, but Old Europe is undoubtedly beautiful.
that is what is so alarming about it's probable imminent destruction..
Reasons the 'trash of the world wants to go there"...is simple and obvious.
to drain the welfare and health systems, which are best in world.And unsustainable, of course.
16 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 14:29
So Turks aren't White?
17 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 14:36
>>16No. sandniggers or sandpeople or whatever you call them, not white.
18 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 14:43
Nope not in Europe
In Europe: NO
In the United States: YES. [Dr Oz being one lol] ..US being so diverse. Turks are viewed and treated as white.
19 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 14:59
not even close.
20 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 15:22
three cheers for the geneva convention
21 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 15:54
Ignorant dumbass, or "person of color" no doubt.
China has quantity, not quality. And if you don't realize that -- well, no doubts there.
Most invention, discovery, breakthroughs and achievement of ALL KINDS came from "white countries".
22 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 16:13
true...but as for quality of goods, I'd actually have to say it has often improved dramatically..it has improved so much, it can be frightening.
Once upon a time,b4 wW2 or maybe even shortly after, "Made in Japan" used to be something people mocked and scorned..
look what happened.It's a sought-after marker of actual quality.
if they can do it, so can or did the Koreans, and why not the Chinese?
same factors in play..
23 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 16:33
What about the Pakis? Can they do it?
24 Name: Anonymous : 2015-11-30 17:16
If the US wanted to destroy these ME countries, they could have, in a day.
Return Last 50 posts First 100 posts