Would bombing Syria make the UK safer?

David Cameron says it would.

What do you think?

Bombing ISIS would.

Definitely not. Have politicians not learned from Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya etc?

Exactly.

Oh look, two little lefties smugly standing by while innocent people get murdered.

You bleat on about humanitarianism, but you're happy to watch innocent people die.

You stupid lefties make me sick.

If you really want to feed your fury and have your blood boil, watch this cúnt:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b6c_1447660445

I watched it all, and was very pleased with myself that I'd not punched a hole in my screen.

What is it?

I won't watch liveleak. That site fucks your laptop up.

It's fine. This is a news anchor on RT on a link with a 'British' 'reporter' (I'm unconvinced by either term since I've watched it) who's espousing NWO geopolitical maneuvering as the real reason for the Paris attacks, amongst other things.

Watch it. If you want to be angry about something it'll do the trick.

That just sounds stupid rather than anger-making.

Did you watch it?

Not pulling out.

Do you think we should send ground forces in?

Yes, with overwhelming force, cuffs off, if not, then no.

fuck no, how does bombing any country entirely make the UK safer?

Just kill ISIS ffs, they're the enemy!

I'm not sure they can be that precise.

So its just better to bomb the entire country of the face off the earth?

What if ISIS had originated or were mainly occupying the US, wonder how many people would be for the whole of the US getting bombed...

probably quite a lot

No it wouldn't. But, hey, Dave's conscience is running the show. Just like Tony's did not so very long ago. To paraphrase Frankie Boyle: "He's a slightly different type of cúnt."