https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bV710c1dgpU

The attendees were common Sunni Muslims. They did not consider themselves as radicals or extremists. They believed that segregation was the right thing to do, both men and women agreed upon this. They even supported stoning or whatever punishment Islam or prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) commanded for adultery or any other crime. They even believed that these practises should be implemented around the world.

Why would any sane liberal open their arms for people with these views to come to their country? What will you do when they become the majority in several European countries at some point this century?

Most of them will be dead or on the way out by the time this happens, so it won't be a problem they have to deal with.

There's an ironic parallel between the coming Islamic takeover of Europe and the threat of climate change, in this regard: if you look at the demographics of climate change deniers, most of them are old conservatives. That is to say, the people who deny climate change the hardest are the same ones who won't be around to suffer its effects, and who also, by the way, were the ones who could've done something about it, and whose denial, obfuscation, inaction etc has essentially ensured it's going to happen.

Likewise, we now have a generation of people raised on a steady diet of political correctness who claim to be liberal progressives but who have in fact helped to lay the tracks for the eventual upheaval and destruction of the principles and values underpinning modern European society. Like the retarded conservatives who can't see past the end of their own noses and limited lifespans, they have enabled and continue to enable the rise of a backwards way of life right in their own backyards, one which will ultimately lead to a great deal of suffering that they will not be alive to see and take responsibility for. Given how much crap both sides give each other over perceived failings, you can't help but love the irony that the far right and far left have both screwed up spectacularly in their own unique ways and ensured that a lot of people in the future are going to suffer very badly.

The far right blunder is ultimately worse of course because it has almost certainly ensured a global catastrophe, whereas Europe turning into a caliphate simply entails a regional cultural and ethical shift (a very bad one, naturally).

Yes it is odd that Many on the left are so concerned about the long term effects of climate change but don't give a crap about the long term effects of demographic changes due to increased muslim immigration, and their higher birthrate than the native populations. At this point for several European countries it is not a matter of if they will become muslim majority, but when it will happen. If they think the citizens will still get to enjoy equal rights for women and gays, and the freedom of speech that we have today when muslims control the government, they are sadly mistaken.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bV710c1dgpU

I wonder if these men know how bad they make Islam ("the truth") look. I wouldn't want any of the ones who raised their hands in response to any questions posed by the speech giver to have suffrage in civil affairs at any level in any country that I've lived in longer than they have. Of course, I'm assuming that they're not paid actors.

Now what does that tell us? Either all Muslims and Islam is radical, or the media is Islamophobic and racist in their presentation of Islam. Islam is not radical, nor is Muslims in general radical.

Or they represent their doctrine and they don't speak for all Muslims.

All Muslims believe in Quran (No stoning in the Quran, no kill the apostate in the Quran, no.... no.... no.... no....), But not all Muslims believe in the books of the Islamic doctrines.

I am the face of islamaphobia. I dont trust them and I dont believe them. I dont want them in this country.

That being said, I also dont believe them when they say they are "common" and not racical or extremists, and at the same time they believe in enforcing Sharia Law on everyone, which a lot of muslims have come out and said they only support it for muslims and that they can live peacefully with non muslims.

So if you are trying to say that 'common' muslims who arent radical or extremists want to enforce Sharia Law on everyone, I dont buy it.

Either way, I dont want to take any chances. Get rid of all of them.

no...the average garden variety muslim holds views which would be both strange and abhorrent to the average fairly liberal minded modern westerner.

In addition to which, if you want to separate it as category,

I notice again even listening to muslim talkback radio callers in last few days since Paris,
they almost without exception hold a 'world view" which most would regard as both incoherent (consistantly they just babble wildly and with increasing anger when you get them started on this, it gets vein-popping Hitlerian in delivery,except Hitler was actually more articulate and coherent ),
and bizarre...

although here it has some partial overlap with the likes of western extreme-Left-ers (a continual spray of anti-Western rhetoric )
and 'truthers"...Conspiracy theorists are still a mix of cranks and provocateurs to us, among muslims, it is probably the largest mainstream view of history.

You combine all of that, mixed with an untouchable unshakeable conviction of the infallibility of Islam and the Koran, and you can see why we have a problem.

Even if we are to believe that only a small minority hold radical extreme views that's still too many Muslims in my opinion.

There are over 1.5 billion Muslims in the world and if only a small minority of them, say 5% are violent extremist that would still be over 75 million people. 75 million people can do a lot of damage worldwide.