What a surprise.

Air strikes.

Barney or Toby or whatever the wet fart journalist's name is needs to be taken outside and given a damned good kicking.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/16/isis-attack-on-paris-may-be-an-act-of-war-but-retaliation-might-not-be-lawful

'bout time Guardian was fucking droned..call in it's co-ordinates..

As long as France works in cooperation with Russia and the United States
in regards to bombing in Syria, then it's fine to go ahead.

Although use of a nuclear weapon against the midst of ISIS
might be better in terms of bringing a timely end
to a war that has already gone on for far too long.

France is a soverign nation and thus has the power to act. I know of no law that surrenders it's soverignty. The left is simply spinning treaties to claim a waiver. They are making things up, again! There is no one world gov, as they wish for and pretend.

I wonder... if the press in WW2 was as the press is today...

The press would be on Normandy beach, having heard from an "unconfirmed source" that it was to be invaded the next day, they'd be there with live reports, wondering the human sacrifice was worth it, if the misdirecting note planted on the dead soldier and left in a harbor was an improper way to treat the dead, if too many civilian lives would be lost, and deploring the anti-German hate on the rise in the populace, and if the action is even legal.

These days, it seems the greatest foreign policy conundrum is trying to selectively and "legally" kill enemies, while simultaneously insuring that we don't hurt their feelings.