White guys only like Asian women because they can't get white women.

I've heard this rather racist generalization bandied about for decades now.

Sad to say that what anecdotal evidence I've seen tends to confirm this.

It's like the same kind of guys that resort to sex tourism and mail-order brides.

People that can't wait to bang Asian hookers on shore leave . . .

Now, why can't these men "get" White women? Do non-White women have lower standards or something?

Please explain this to me. There are two parts to this.

Its also because white women are very difficult to be in relationships with these days. They want everything, then they don't know what they want. Its just not worth it.

They are hot, though

Cowboy Up, son . . . sounds like you've been watching too much An Unmarried Woman (1978).

Being in a relationship with a hot white girl is a freaking nightmare, AND they are always looking to trade up.

Its just not worth it!

>>5
I think you nailed it anon.

>>5
I see what you are saying, anon, but hang in there, Young Padawan . . .

Just more wishful thinking and propaganda from the wealthy fathers of white daughters. I've been around the world, and it's totally the opposite. Fair complexions are just not naturally an animal magnet. Go into any bar, and you'll see that the guys only hit on lighter complexions when they can't get darker complexions. It's just Nature.

Actually blonde and white women are seen as so attractive only because it is the most unique/rare look- if it's natural lol. The same goes for blue eyes.

I like Asian women because Asian women are hot.

I don't need to confine myself to any one race or ethnic group. I'm beautiful. I am a shining star.

Nobody wants to believe that white women control everything, but the sad truth is they do. They're the most prized even though black, hispanic, Indian, Asian and Middle Eastern women are all beautiful in their own way. Not Polynesian women though. It's unfair that one race and gender should have the monopoly on all the guys.

Middle Eastern women

I've actually studied Phrenology and the now-out of fashion "science" of racial anthropology and agree that Persian and Indian subcontinental peoples are "White." However, many of the Middle Eastern races have the Semitic nose and ear lobe features and thusly are not classed as White.

Not to further complicate matters.

Next month I'm going to go back to school after 10 years to study anthropology (Getting my PHD 10 years from now) so I think your post is really interesting! Thanks for sharing! Let me know if you want to talk more about your class!

Indian is Asian. Sometimes Middle Easterners are included too.

>>15
I like your screen name. I watched everything that Anonymous has EVER done except for there latest DDOS's. Anonymous been sucking something fierce lately, so I don't really think I'm missing out.

Is it racist to say this as though Asian women are only worthy of being a fallback from white women?

Asian women can make for lovely wives and girlfriends.

I think it's pretty clear the only chance a man has of getting a good woman is by visiting a third world country where feminism hasn't taken root yet.

Feminists are good women. I am a proud feminist.

Although feminism, at its inception, was bigoted (It focused only on the ascension of affluent white women), it did provide some good. Women deserve the right to vote and work or do anything else they want to. Feminism's modern form is more about female superiority. It does NOT mean equality today, if it ever did.

I think if modern feminists were truly concerned about the welfare of women, they'd be more concerned about what's going on in the middle east rather than what's going on in the western world. Feminism has won in the western world. How anyone can claim that women are still oppressed when something like Findom exists is beyond me.

Feminism has decreed that all sex on campus is rape. Some say all male-female sexual relations are rape. If you approach a woman, you're a pervert and a rapist. If you don't approach a woman, you're a pussy. If a man marries a woman, she'll divorce him and make him pay alimony until the day he dies. This is the reason why Robin Williams committed suicide.

Women attend college more than men, women graduate more than men, women excel in every field except for math and science. Women get better jobs than men. Men have been pushed into doing manual labor while women do the thinking. The wage gap is a highly debated issue, but many believe it to be highly exaggerated.

The thing is, men aren't biologically equipped to compete with women. That's why so many men aren't reaching their potential nowadays. Men are having an identity crisis. Documentaries have been made about this.

What rights does a man have that a woman doesn't? It's illegal to discriminate based on race. Feminism has won. Now it's gone too far. Little girls in school aren't reprimanded for hitting little boys. If a men's rights group wants to assemble in a college, its picketed by feminists and the attendees are called "rape apologists".

Women like to talk about double standards all the time, but they benefit from the greatest double standard of them all: If they want to work, they can; If they want to sap the money out of a man and never work a day in their life, they can. If you say anything negative about a woman it's "______-shaming".

I'm not saying all women are like this, but the sense of entitlement from women is something I see all the time. But then again, I'm a returning student who doesn't make any money. It's okay for women to not make a cent but demand that her boyfriend makes 6 figures.

I could go on and on and on.

>>20

I could go on and on and on.

No need.

>>21
I don't mean to sound like a jerk, I just think this is a very important issue in the western world.

>>22
You should go on, you are really onto something. Of course, if you bring these ideas to an open forum, you will be castigated by the PC thought police.

Amen brother. You nailed it.

>>20
You're in for some serious disappointment in your anthropology PhD once you find out the ideological leanings of the field.

>>25
Well, the thing is I've taken many political assessments and I place as a left libertarian every time. It's not that I have a problem with the leftist point of view, it's just that I can see when something goes too far.

This is how I explain it to my republican parents: Any economist will tell you it's not the size of the government that's relevant, it's how well it works. I think that the government should have its place, but it should be caring about DIFFERENT things that it cares about now. The government should protect against discrimination, but it should not recognize gender and race. This is the step towards a post-gender, post-race society.

When you think about it, feminism is a self-defeating philosophy. You'll never achieve equality if you focus only on the feminine, rather than all human equality.

>>26
Those assessments are worse than meaningless.

I'm sure that 'any economist' is more likely to tell you that size of government and efficiency are both endogenous and collinear, leaving any assessment of those claims up to normative preference. Anyway, all that I'm saying is that I don't even consider myself a feminist or a leftist and I still wouldn't talk to you in real life based on those comments--it will be a lonely 10 years (speaking of which, dude, cut that time in half).

>>27
I don't mean to sound abrasive. I really do consider myself very open to new ideas. People who know me well know that I'm always changing my lifestyle based on things that I've read. Maybe if you told me which statements offended you I could try to explain what I meant when I wrote it.

Oh and the reason I say ten years is because I have to start from ground zero, but you can apparently go straight from bachelor's to PHD program. I read on an official site that the PHD for anthropology takes 6 years. 4+6=10. It'll be a long road, but I took a good 10 years to decide what I wanted to do with my life and I'm certain this is it.

>>28
My significant other is from the 'third world,' and it's still grating to hear you disparage all women from the first world as not "good women." Note that the reason I wouldn't associate with you is because it makes you seem like a loser who says stuff like this to justify your own relationship failings. Because of such guys us others face those probing questions that are really veiled suggestions that we "struck out" with women in our countries. Stupid is coming from all sides.

Anyway, good luck on starting your degree--if you're starting from the BA then keep an open mind, because your interests are bound to change. If you're looking to become a professor, I recommend against anthropology simply because the job prospects are especially bleak right now (everyone I know in this field has struggled finding jobs lately, even coming from very good programs). PhDs take however long it takes to finish your dissertation, although an average of six years sounds about right.

>>29
Well, to be fair, I haven't had much luck with women, I admit, but my point of view is already anthropocentric, so I can't imagine it changing too much. Women don't like me because I'm not at least 2 inches taller than them, I appear sickly, I look like I don't have good genes to pass to their children, I don't look like I'll survive the winter, I don't look like I could kill a mastodon, cut it up and cook it. I've come to terms with this.

Your news about the job prospects is really disheartening. I don't want to major in any other humanity. Sociology is too politically charged for me and philosophy's intransigence towards it's own elitist vocabulary is becoming too particular and useless.

>>30
Anthropocentric doesn't mean anything in that context: I have an increasing feeling that I'm being trolled. Your failure is your own, not only for being lame but also because you're so narcissistic and speak of "women" so generally. Do you think most people calculate genetic fitness in such a way? It's safe to say that self-defeat is off-putting for many women, and that being short isn't the problem.

Anthropology, like sociology, is a social science and not part of the humanities (although this line can be blurred especially if you're from Europe).

>>31
It can be either a humanity or a social science, so we're both right. When I went to my college orientation they said they first thing I need to get is an Associate of Arts.

There is such a thing as Biological Anthropology. What I'm talking about is sexual selection theory and, specifically, the Red Queen theory. Any biologist worth his salt will subscribe to the theory. It's incredibly naive to think that the ONLY thing in play is personality.

Judging from your vocabulary and your knowledge of college I'm guessing you make an amount of money that she feels is enough for her to feel comfortable. If you don't make the amount you do, I don't think she would be that interested. These things have all been tested. I'm willing to bet that you make more than her too.

If you DON'T make enough money, then I'm guessing your shoulders are broad, you're symmetrical and you look like you'll give her healthy children. These things are subconscious. Again, I don't mean to sound harsh, but the science is clear.

I understand that there's a difference between what I'm talking about and cultural anthropology. In fact, cultural anthropology might be what I'm more interested in, but I'll DEFINITELY wait until I'm studying to decide that. I'd love to live with a tribe of hunter-gatherers in Papua New Guinea though.

>>32
Sorry, wildman, your knowledge of biology is about on par with your knowledge of economics. Realize that your pseudo-sociobiology is post-hoc rationalization for your sexual failings, and despair. You're talking specifically about the theory of inclusive fitness, the intellectual lineage of which can be traced back to Robert Trivers (indeed, a biological anthropologist who considers himself a social theorist) in the social sciences and popularized by E.O. Wilson. What you are saying is only necessary if we take at face value the most reductionist approach (where the unit of analysis is the gene), but it is simply false to proclaim that this is universally accepted among biologists (even Wilson doesn't think so, as he has become a proponent of group selection).

I understand the impulse of people who want to evoke 'science' without actually putting in the work to learn or practice it--I know, real physics is hard, with, like math, and stuff, and biology requires years of grinding experimentation.

>>33
Hmmm, possibly. I concede that I'm a layman who's took to these theories during my time in the Navy. I'll suppose we'll have to have this conversation again after I've had true, scholarly experience in my field.

I'm one of those modern gals who actually got past grade six in school. Go figure.

>>35
I'm not saying feminists are stupid. In fact, they're really smart. They've figured out how to dominate the work place, have all the control over mating rituals, make art kowtow to their standards (See the story of the attempted censorship of the Athena Tennis Girl by feminists) and still make men feel like they're part of the patriarchy.

"good women" you sound like a bigot.

You mean, go where women are ignorant and subservient so that they worship you even though you don't deserve it more likely.

A real man should want their wife to be their partner, not beneath them in intelligence or power.

go where women are ignorant and subservient

You sound so much more pleasant and tolerant than a Rhino.

>>38
I'm generalizing but then again, any woman must come from an ignorant upbringing if she is okay with being walked upon and treated as inferior.

Although I disagree--there are many reasons people choice to accept different conditions--that doesn't sound nearly as bad. At the same time, as much as I think Rhino wrote something stupid, he never mentions treating any woman as an inferior, only that he thinks women outside of the West are "good" (does that mean he treats them as superior?). Of course, you can backtrack and say you really didn't mean to say that all women from the third-world are ignorant and subservient, because I say stupid things all the time too ;~}.

>>40
I said I was generalizing but yes, the majority of third world countries have ignorant tendencies and are especially backwards with their treatment of women. This is why they are third world countries and not world powers.

>>41
I understand, but that's not what you wrote. "Backwards with their treatment of women" is backtracking to revise your statement to make it palatable, when what you really wrote was "go where women are ignorant and subservient" -- in other words, it's the women who are ignorant, not their treatment. That's what you really believe inside, and everything to come after is rationalization.

(Note I am not just judging you, since I do this too, but am merely describing a tendency that we are often unaware of. As another note, I am not sure why you are implying a causal relationship from treatment of women to world power status; historically, most world powers have treated women poorly, too.)

>>42
I'm not backtracking at all. I was elaborating since clearly a generalization I felt was a commonly well known one was not understood as expected. End of story.

>>43
It's well-known that most women of the world are ignorant? Well, you learn something new every day!

>>44

Well, you learn something new every day

And now that you're no longer ignorant, you're not a woman anymore.

Or maybe -- and this is a radical concept here, so brace yourself -- they just like them for who they are.

Sad to say that what anecdotal evidence I've seen tends to confirm this.

The original post is racist nonsense. I find women of all nationalities attractive, and I have never been involved with sex tourism, mail-order brides, or shore leave hookers. In addition, I certainly "get" white women.

There is nothing to explain to you - if you are a racist and don't think white men should be dating women of "Asian" [sic] ancestry, you have the problem, not those of us who do not discriminate.

This phenom annoys the heck out of certain (type?) of white women, and is amusing (knee jerk reaction) to some others who see these couples. The fact of the matter is, on the bright side, a beer bellied white guy who lays bricks for a living can seem genuinely hot and exotic to foreign ladies - similarly to how oily, rude pizza boys from Turkey attract some white girls. It would be good to society if more white guys would find themselves a good Asian woman, to balance things out. And these women think you're a really cool guy if you have a steady job and a responsible outlook on family and life (which rules you out, anon).

>>48

The fact of the matter is, on the bright side, a beer bellied white guy who lays bricks for a living can seem genuinely hot and exotic to foreign ladies

Ladies who want a European, American or Aussie passport maybe.

>>49
I know! Then some of those fellow whine about immigration fraud....

>>50
True!

>>47

a beer bellied white guy who lays bricks for a living can seem genuinely hot and exotic to foreign ladies

Thanks, you've helped me on my journey of self understanding. I realize now... it's the bricks.

mmm bb i luv a man with bricks

I apologise for the kerfuffle and brouhaha my intital post may have caused.

To be frank I myself do enjoy the company of Asiatic women, to-wit: Those of the Persian, Hebrew, and Levantine extraction.

Hope this clears matters up in a most reasonable manner.

I always thought it had to do with Asian women still tending to be traditional and subservient in nature-not all but the majority.

I thought it was because of anime.

or

White guys like Asian women because the women are petite and meek. What they don't know is, once you marry an Asian woman, she rules the roost.

I think you're talking about ugly asians and beautiful whites.. without realising the opposites exist.

Also not realising that sex is love.. love is sex..

Maybe it does or doesn't stay that way when you raise a family which is the real kind of love.. love is supposed to sensual.. but real love is the positives and negatives.

The negative infinity and the positive infinity.. or at least the best kind in money/age land.

An ugly white is no better than an ugly asian.. otherwise there's something wrong with you.

Racism (or the opposite of) is only correct.. correct means right.

>>55
The general type of Racism.. it isn't correct/right.

>>1

White guys only like Asian women because they can't get white women.

Incoarrect.

Look at the average White woman. She is very much oaverweight, often spoarts tattoos, drinks alcoahol like a fish in water, and is filled with raging conflicts much encouraged by aor Jewish-controlled media.

Look then at the average Asian woman. She is slim and appealing. She is feminine, demure, not addicted to drugs and alcoahol, and remains soa foar much of her life. She is also not subject to a Jewish-controlled media which fills her head with lies that lead to conflicts with men.

Naturally from these simple observations you would expect men to prefer Asian women.