Serious discussion about Israel. Who's in the right and who's in the wrong /newpol/? I'm writing an expository essay, so the less biased you are the better, I've already read up on what I can but more is better.

The wealthy bombing the poor
OP it's pretty cut and dry..

Believing anything by jews
ISHYGDDT

But I hate mudslimes too so, fuck both them.

Basically, Palestine got a chunk of their land taken after WWII so the Jews could have "muh ancestral home goyim," now they're not content with it and keep pushing Palestinians further and further away, which Murrica is supporting because they like Jewish sandniggers better than the Islamic variety.

>>2
I don't think it's as cut and dry as you say, Israel is definitely in the wrong but Britain and America had a big part to play as well.

>>3

Britain and America had a big part to play

How many jews are in high positions in America again?
and Britain basically follows America everywhere so...

I think it is quite cut and dry.

+ Israel continuing to expand into Palestinian land
Imagine for a second if the US was encroaching on Mexican land, do you think Mexico would roll over?
I think there would be some resistance there.

in front of a church as a mass is finishing and the religious folks are leaving, as I abhor the idea of their god and want to show off my intellectual superiority

>>1
The only way to be as unbiased as possible is to look at the morality of each sides actions in isolation. Meaning, the morality of action X is independent of any justification.
So, the bombing of a school cannot be justified by the bombing of a bus. And the bombing of a bus is not justified by the killing of some children - which is not justified by the kidnapping and murder of a soldier, which is not justified by....

Once you look at each act in isolation; without accepting "one wrong justifies another", you will see that all sides in the Israeli conflict are immoral, unethical, and thoroughly corrupt.