"There's something different about what happened from Charlie Hebdo, and I think everybody would feel that. There was a sort of particularized focus and perhaps even a legitimacy in terms of -- not a legitimacy, but a rationale that you could attach yourself to somehow and say, okay, they're really angry because of this and that. This Friday was absolutely indiscriminate. It wasn't to aggrieve one particular sense of wrong. It was to terrorize people."

So was the Charlie Hebdo attack to terrorize people and the the Paris attack was to "aggrieve" one "sense of wrong." What an idiot.

It was the fact that there was such a weak reaction to the Charlie Hebdo attack that emboldened the terrorist to strike again. I'm sure the would say that they were offended by the type of music at the concert or by the French government's actions or by the short skirts Parisian prosties wear. Everything not in line with Muslims' exact teachings for their exact way of thinking offends them mightily and they act out. This is what they have in common with libs, for those who keep wondering why libs sympathize with them so strongly.